Animal studies:

Annual report 2019

The University of Groningen (UG) and the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) conduct animal experiments within the scope of research and teaching, because some important and relevant questions cannot be answered without the use of laboratory animals.

We are open about these activities and have created this website to show how we conduct animal studies and what we take into consideration in such testing. This is our contribution to the social debate about animal experiments in which anyone can form a considered opinion.

The Netherlands to spearhead alternatives for animal testing in 2025

The Netherlands has set itself the goal of becoming the worldwide leader in innovative research methods without animal experiments by 2025. As early as 1997, the Netherlands became a world leader in this area when it prohibited animal experiments for cosmetic products such as make-up, toothpaste, shampoo and deodorant. In 2004, the EU followed; since 2013, imports of such products from outside the EU have also been prohibited. In March 2016, State Secretary for Economic Affairs Martijn van Dam asked the Nationaal Comité advies dierproevenbeleid (NCad) to draft a transition scheme for the development of innovative animal-free research. This transition will be realized in collaboration with research organizations and private enterprise, and cover, for example, the statutory safety testing of chemical substances, allergy testing of new products, food ingredients, pesticides and vaccines. NCad believes that it should be possible to conduct such tests without animals being used by 2025. In other scientific domains, NCad also sees opportunities to gradually replace animal experiments with new techniques. In recent years, many alternative research methods have been developed that no longer require the use of animals. Examples include allergy tests on artificial human skin and a computer model of the heart used to investigate the effects of medication.

The University of Groningen supports initiatives to reduce the use of lab animals through innovative techniques and to become the world leader in such innovation by 2025. It is already promoting techniques such as the use of organoids (miniature organs cultivated from stem cells) and tissues and organs supplied by abattoirs as alternatives for lab animals. Nevertheless, future research will not be able to dispense with animal testing entirely. Particularly in medical biology, host-microbe interactions, neurobiology, physiology, pharmacy, immunology and behavioural biology, research into complex systems will remain essential. Organ-organ interactions and interactions between organisms and their environment are important elements of the research being conducted at the University of Groningen. At present, such interactions cannot be investigated adequately in animal-free systems.

Animal testing statistics

Within the UG, animal experiments are carried out for the benefit of fundamental and translational research, as well as for educational purposes. These experiments are carried out in the facility at the UMCG, or at the facility at FSE and there are also experiments taking place in the open field. In 2019, a total of 18,731 animal experiments were carried out, mainly on mice, rats and birds. In 2018, a total of 18,561 animal experiments were carried out. This shows a slight increase in 2019. In 2019, fewer experiments were carried out on mice and rats and more on zebra fish. The number of animal experiments shows an annual fluctuation due to available budgets and research capacity. The figure below shows an overview of the numbers of animal experiments that were carried out, categorized according to animal species, for the last 5 years.

At the UG, the number of experiments on mice shows large annual fluctuations, whilst the number of experiments on rats continues to drop, as it has since 2013. This year we presented the Zebrafish data separate from the other fish strains for the first time.

The number of ‘other’ birds that are used in animal experiments has fluctuated for years and this is expected to remain the case for the foreseeable future. The Central Animal Facility (CDP) expanded its fish facility, which led to a relatively large increase in the number of fish used in 2019 compared to 2018. This is likely to increase over the coming years because there are now six different research groups that use the fish facility.

The number of animal experiments appears to be reasonably stable at present, following the introduction in 2014 of the new Experiments on Animals Act (WoD). This initially led to a decrease in the number of animal experiments, possibly due to the submission of new project applications and the processing of projects taking longer than before. The coming years will show whether these numbers are now stable.

Why animal experiments?

Staying healthy while getting older (Healthy Ageing), adapting to changing circumstances (Adaptive Life) and creating a robust society (Sustainable Society) are policy spearheads of the UMCG and the UG. Many of our research programmes therefore focus on issues such as healthy ageing, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes and Parkinson’s disease, which sometimes require animal testing. Animal experiments are also required to study ecological phenomena such as bird migration.

Animal experiments at the UG/UMCG

The University and the UMCG want their fundamental and applied research programmes to be among the best in the world. We wish to conduct the animal studies required to achieve this goal in the best possible manner, which means providing optimal care to lab animals and safeguarding of their welfare as well as optimal facilitation of the animal experimenters.

Our animal tests are conducted at the UMCG (65%) and the Faculty of Science and Engineering (FSE, 35%), where animal testing is concentrated in several research institutes.

▶ Behavioural & Physiological Ecology Group
Research into the behaviour of animals in their natural surroundings

▶ Conservation Ecology Group
Research into the impact of habitat changes on organisms

▶ Theoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences (TRES)
Focus on theorical developments in evolutionary ecology, behavioural sciences and evolutionary systems biology

▶ Evolutionary Genetics, Development & Behaviour (EGDB)
Research into the proximate cause of phenotypic diversity and its ecological and evolutionary consequences

▶ Genomics Research in Ecology & Evolution in Nature (GREEN)
Research into ecological, evolutionary and conservationist issues in relation to biodiversity, ecosystems, living environment interactions, speciation, adaptation and plasticity

▶ Neurobiology
Research into the role of the brain in the capacity of animals and humans to adapt to challenges and opportunities in the environment

▶ Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP)
Fundamental and applied pharmaceutical research

▶ Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration (GUIDE)
Development of new medication

▶ Health Research and Epidemiology (SHARE)
Fundamental and applied research into factors that help people to stay healthy while getting old (Healthy Ageing)

▶ European Research Insitute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA)
Fundamental research into factors causing ageing

▶ Biomaterials (W.J.Kolff Institute)
Applied research into biomaterials and implants

▶ Fundamental, Clinical and Translational Cancer Research (Cancer Research Center Groningen)
Fundamental and applied research into oncology and tumour development

Prof. dr. Martien Kas

Researching the biology of brain disorders

‘Social interaction plays a key role in many neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression, autism, dementia and schizophrenia. Fewer social contacts with friends, family and colleagues is often one of the first signs of such a disorder. I study the biological mechanisms at the root of social interaction and abnormalities in this interaction’.

‘Neuropsychiatric conditions are traditionally classified according to visible, qualitative symptoms. A distinction is made between groups of patients who deviate from the norm, without the need for any biological qualification. What we do is fundamentally different. In behavioural biology, we look at the biological causes of behaviour. This transcends individual disorders: patients with very different diagnoses such as depression, dementia or schizophrenia, may show striking similarities when it comes to reduced social interaction.

One of the ways in which we try to work out whether these shared symptoms have a common biological basis is by conducting animal tests. We want to know how circuits in the brain develop and how they contribute to social behaviour. Many neuropsychiatric conditions appear very early in life, when the cortex (the area that processes outside stimuli) is still developing. Mice are perfect for such experiments, because their brains process stimuli in much the same way as human brains. In addition, mice display a whole range of social behaviours. We make EEGs, for example, or analyse the development of the brain systems of mice displaying reduced social interaction.

To translate this into human behaviour, we record the same kind of data as we would for human patients. Brain scans, blood levels, but social behaviour too. We try to observe behaviour as objectively as possible. Measuring social behaviour in patients is extremely tricky. Research of this kind usually involves questionnaires, but of course we never know whether patients have a realistic idea of their level of social interaction. To overcome this problem, we have developed an app for smartphones, which monitors user behaviour, for example, whether they leave the house, how often they make phone calls, use WhatsApp and so on. This gives us a good, objective impression of their behaviour.

We hope that these approaches will help us to understand the biological mechanisms behind social withdrawal and ultimately develop better medication for the abnormal behaviour associated with various brain disorders, such as depression, dementia and schizophrenia. We are not conducting this research on our own. One of our partners is a large European consortium working under the name PRISM (Psychiatric Ratings using Intermediate Stratified Markers). This project, funded by the Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI), pools the resources of thirty-three universities and pharmaceutical companies (’.

Prof. dr. Eugene Berezikov

Exploring killifish as a new model organism for ageing

‘At ERIBA we conduct research into the process of ageing. We study the molecular processes responsible for the ageing of cells, tissues and organs, and try to work out how age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and cancer develop. We use various model organisms to do this. They include invertebrates such as yeast cells and worms as well as animals such as zebra fish and mice. At the moment, we are introducing a new model, the oviparous killifish (order of ray-finned fish). These fish have the potential to speed up our research into ageing’.

‘Good model organisms are essential for carrying out research into fundamental biological processes such as the development of diseases or ageing. As these are highly fundamental processes, a lot can be achieved with research into invertebrates such as yeast cells and worms. The basic molecular mechanisms in vertebrates and invertebrates are reasonably similar. Yeast and worms are relatively cheap and have a short life cycle. But the main advantage – the fact that they are invertebrates – is also the main disadvantage. You reach a point when you want to test your findings on vertebrate organisms that resemble humans more closely.

We often use mice in our research into ageing, but zebra fish are a good alternative. The tricky thing about studying ageing is that the symptoms we want to examine typically do not appear until late in life. This isn’t a problem with invertebrate models because they only live for a matter of days or weeks. Mice and zebra fish, on the other hand, take two to three years to age. This makes that the research proceeds at a relatively slow pace.

We are therefore in urgent need of a vertebrate model organism that ages rapidly. In recent years, we have been looking at a new, promising model organism: the killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri). The origins of the killifish have led them to develop very quickly. The fish come from Africa, where they grow in pools during the short rainy season and lay eggs right at the start of the ensuing long dry period. Their entire life cycle lasts just a few months; months in which the fish genuinely age. The brightly coloured males start to fade towards the end of the season, they lose their eyesight, move around less actively and have an increased risk of developing cancer.

In short, the fish display many of the signs of ageing that occur in humans. We also think that killifish could be an effective model for studying neurodegenerative diseases and metabolism. Research using killifish is still at an early stage; there are only a few laboratories in the world currently working with these fish. But the number is growing. At the moment, we have several hundred fish in our tanks, but our research still focuses on how best to look after them. And we are obviously looking for suitable research projects that can be modified to use killifish to speed up our research into ageing’.

Legislation and regulations

Animal studies are governed by strict legislation and regulations. Since 1977, the welfare of lab animals used in the Netherlands has been protected by the Wet op de dierproeven (Wod). To supplement this act, the Dierproevenbesluit (Animal Experiments Decree) was adopted in 1985. The principle underlying the act is the ‘No, unless’ principle: animal experiments are only allowed if there are no alternatives. If researchers can conduct a study by using a computer model or slaughterhouse material, for example, they will not be allowed to use animals for their experiments.

With the Wod, the Netherlands had good legislation governing the use of lab animals. There were major differences with other countries, however, including European member states. To achieve identical legislative standards – at least within the European Union – guidelines were drafted, which in the Netherlands led to a revision of the Wod in 2015. The current Wod defines an animal experiment as ‘any use, invasive or non-invasive, of an animal for experimental or other scientific purposes, with known or unknown outcome, or teaching purposes, which may cause the animal a level of pain, suffering, anxiety or lasting harm equivalent to, or higher than, that caused by the introduction of a needle according to good veterinary practice’. Experiments conducted on animals without an endoskeleton, such as worms, snails and insects, are not covered by the Wod. The intention of the Wod is to protect lab animals in the Netherlands. One of its clauses stipulates, for example, that only qualified personnel are allowed to use lab animals and only within institutions that have a permit for such use.

In the old Experiments on Animals Act, two definitions were used for research involving wild animals: one covering their use in the laboratory and one covering animals living in nature. This distinction is no longer made in the newWod, which means that the same definition covers all animal testing, including research involving wild animals, whether in the laboratory or in their biotopes. It soon appeared that research involving wild animals in their biotopes was not covered in sufficient depth in the memorandum with the title ‘Wanneer is er sprake van een dierproef in de zin van de wet?’ (‘When is an experiment an animal experiment under the Act?’, in Dutch only) which was published on theCCDwebsite on 3 October 2016. A project group was therefore established with representatives from the relevant fields. In collaboration with theCCDand theNVWA, in 2017 the group published guidelines with the title ‘Dierproeven met wilde dieren in hun biotoop’ (‘Animal experiments with wild animals in their biotopes’, in Dutch only). UG researchers were involved in the formulation of these guidelines, which are used by UG researchers applying for and implementing animal experiments in nature.

Codes of Practice

Although legislation provides frameworks, it does not concern itself with details. For this reason, its specific interpretation may be unclear. Experts have therefore drafted several Codes of Practice covering various research fields: ‘Animal experiments in Cancer Research’ (1999), ‘Immunization of Laboratory Animals’ (2000) and ‘Safeguarding the welfare of Lab Animals’ (2001). Anyone working with lab animals must comply with these codes.
In addition, the Dierexperimentencommissie (DEC) of the UG has formulated internal guidelines to standardize University practices. These guidelines comprise the University’s opinions about the discomfort codes, the choice of species and ethical considerations.

Animal experiments: from application to execution


The Centrale Commissie Dierproeven (CCD) is a national committee which makes decisions to grant or reject project licenses for experiments based on the research applications. On its website, the CCD publishes non-technical summaries of the licenses it has granted.

NCad is another important national committee. NCad’s role is to bring about improvements in the application of the 3R principle and the ethical assessment thereof in scientific and applied research and in teaching activities, in order to minimize the use of laboratory animals both nationally and internationally.

In 2018, the IvD discussed 30 CCD applications and 27 were sent to the CCD, who submitted the projects for advice to the UG’s Animal Ethics Committee (DEC).

Of the 27 projects sent, 23 were authorized by the CCD: 21 in 2018 and two in 2019. One project obtained partial authorization.


The UG has an impartial animal experiments committee (DECRUG) which assesses the use of lab animals under the auspices of the CCD, using the CCD’s opinions and guidelines. It also abides by generally applicable viewpoints from the various codes of practice. The DECRUGmembership includes experts in laboratory animals and their protection, animal experiments, alternatives for such experiments and ethical assessment.

The DEC assesses all research proposals in the light of current legislation and regulations. It also weighs the benefits of animal experiments against the discomfort caused to the animals to be used.

The intrinsic value of each animal is central to the decision whether an animal experiment is ethically acceptable or not. However, other considerations also play a role, for example an animal’s psychological complexity (cf. primates), the societal status of a species based on factors such as social closeness (cats and dogs), historical value (agricultural animals) and social relationship (seals).

The UG and the UMCG do not have facilities for experiments conducted with primates, and the UG has formulated a separate point of view on this issue (in Dutch only).


An important change in the revised Wod is that institutions must combine their expertise concerning animal welfare in an Instantie voor Dierenwelzijn (IvD). The IvD assesses the animal welfare aspects of a research project that has previously been approved by the DEC and the CCD and ensures that it can be properly implemented. It also advises researchers about the application of the 3R principle and supervises the research preparations and the skills and training of the researchers involved.

The IvD membership includes a designated veterinarian, the animal facility’s Location Supervisor, a scientist and, if necessary, an external expert such as a radiation specialist or biological safety officer.

Article 14c of the Experiments on Animals Act lists the tasks of an Animal Welfare Body in five points (14c.1a to 1e). Article 14c.1c states that the IvD ‘guarantees the establishment and review of internal procedures concerning monitoring, reporting and follow-up with regard to the wellbeing of the animals housed in the institution’s animal housing facilities’. In other words, the Article states that the IvD organizes the laboratory animals’ guaranteed wellbeing and produces a record of it.

For each IvD protocol, the UG’s IvDs check whether the animal study will be carried out using animals that are caught in the wild. If so, the IvD checks whether the required flora and fauna dispensation has been obtained. This internal process will not change and continue to be used.

IvD platform

The national IvD platform represents all member IvDs in the Netherlands. They currently represent 45 IvDs, which is approximately 90% of all organizations. The IvD platform is in contact with government organizations such as the CCD, the Netherlands National Committee for the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes (NCad) and the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA). The IvD platform meets four times a year to discuss any current issues.

Another of the platform’s important tasks is the promotion of contact between the IvDs. Last year, the platform organized two meetings that brought all IvDs together. The first meeting was the ‘Severity Assessment’ workshop, which was organized in collaboration with the NVWA and with input from the CCD. A team of representatives from the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations / European College of Laboratory Animal Medicine / European Society of Laboratory Animal Veterinarians (FELASA/ECLAM/ESLAV) Working Group and from the European Commission were also present to host the workshop. The second meeting took place during the 2018 Biotechnology days. At this meeting a workshop was hosted by the IvD Platform Working Group on Experimental Design & Statistical Analysis.

Prof. dr. Jan Maarten van Dijl

Tracing infections in the body

‘Bacterial infections are a persistent problem for patients. Bacteria like to nestle on implants, for example, infect heart valves or cause pneumonia. It is vital that we trace and treat infections like these as swiftly as possible. That is not easy because an early-stage infection is not visible to the naked eye. We are therefore developing fluorescing molecules that attach themselves to bacteria and illuminate the site of an infection’.

‘It is vital to diagnose infections early. Once an infection takes hold, the bacteria can form a plaque or become encapsulated. This makes them inaccessible to antibiotics, and the infection becomes difficult to treat. People sometimes even need additional surgery to combat the infection. Moreover, prolonged and difficult courses of antibiotics increase the risk of antibiotic resistance.
The biggest challenge is diagnosing and localizing an early infection in a patient. In our lab, we are exploring whether we can do this by using fluorescing molecules that travel to the locus of infection, causing it to shine when illuminated.
The first step in this research is to design and build a fluorescing substance that is specific to bacterial infections. We tried taking an antibiotic molecule – vancomycin – and attaching a commonly-used fluorescent molecule. We know that vancomycin attaches specifically to the cell wall of a particular group of bacteria and not to human cells. Another advantage is the fact that vancomycin is a current and safe drug, which means that the combination molecule is probably safe too.
We now need to carry out tests on tissues and animals to check whether this combination molecule actually works in the way we hope and can be used in patients. We first tested the substance on dead human tissue. After pre-treating the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis with the labelled antibiotic, we introduced the labelled bacterium under the skin. Thanks to the fluorescence, this artificial infection was indeed visible through the skin. Although this demonstrated the technical success of the substance, it was still an artificial situation. A tissue model like this obviously lacks any circulation, for example.
Before moving to clinical use on patients, we conducted two animal experiments to test the effect of the substance in vivo. We conducted these experiments in collaboration with colleagues from Germany and the United States. Mice with an infected hind leg were treated with the labelled antibiotic, after which we recorded the site of fluorescence. This indeed proved to be the locus of infection, demonstrating that the principle works. The bladder also lit up, but this was not altogether unexpected because vancomycin is secreted in the urine’.

dr. Sahar El Aidy

Researching the influence of intestinal bacteria on the brain

‘Adults have around a hundred-thousand billion bacteria in their guts, weighing almost one-and-a-half kilos. It is gradually becoming clear that these intestinal bacteria, known collectively as the microbiota, have a huge influence on the body. Work in my laboratory focuses on how the effect of intestinal bacteria on the gut can influence our brain. Gut flora and the brain seem to be talking to each other all the time’.

‘I chose the word “talking” carefully – it is a dialogue. And it’s a two-way dialogue: the intestinal bacteria influence our health and behaviour, but our behaviour can also change our gut flora.
The intestines have a direct link with the brain via the vagus nerve, an important neural pathway that transmits signals in both directions between the gut and the brain. Bacteria influence this communication. Intestinal bacteria are like tiny factories for neuroactive substances. They produce the same chemical substances – neurotransmitters – that our nervous system uses to communicate. These include serotonin, dopamine and noradrenalin. Since the bacterial population influences this production, it has a direct impact on the behaviour and mood of the host.
In other words, it is important to ensure a good variety of intestinal bacteria. Having adequate gut flora starts at birth. During delivery, a baby comes into contact with the mother’s vaginal microbiota. The composition of this microbiota largely determines the composition of the baby’s gut flora, which in turn influences the development of the infant’s immune system, metabolism and brain. An abnormal composition due to stress, diet, infections or the use of antibiotics will therefore affect the health of the child.
To understand these effects, researchers are studying the gut flora of mice. They examine how prenatal stress in pregnant mice, for example, affects the gut flora of newborn mice. Their gut flora shows signs of abnormality immediately after birth, but by adulthood, the microbiota of these mice is no different from that of “normal mice”. However, as soon as these mice are put under stress, their gut flora shows a strong reaction. It seems that mice whose mothers were stressed are themselves more sensitive to stress. So the bacteria in our gut appear to be one of the factors that determine whether we will become anxious or depressed.
I also study another important factor that affects our gut flora: nutrition. Our diet is very different from that of our ancestors. A prehistoric diet would have contained many more indigestible ingredients, which then served as food for the intestinal bacteria. Our current diet is threatening the existence of many of these ancient bacteria. We want to understand the implications. And whether we can limit the damage by eating more indigestible food.

Research into the interaction between intestinal bacteria and the brain is relatively new. We still understand very little about this highly complex relationship. Looking to the distant future, I think that this field may provide starting points for developing new drugs to treat mental health problems. We’ve noticed, for example, that many behavioural disorders occur in people with intestinal problems or food allergies. Take ADHD, autism or depression, for example, or certain brain diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease or Alzheimer’s disease. There is still a lot to discover in this particular field’.

End of experiments


The UG policy states that vertebrates – with the exception of mammals – that are being cared for at the UG in semi-natural circumstances and are no longer required for research may be eligible for adoption. An important condition is that animals can only be adopted by private persons. The permit holder does not allow the animals to be traded. No animals were available for adoption in 2017.


In most cases adoption is not possible, for example because the brain and/or other organs and body parts are required for further study and analysis. In that case, the animals will be euthanized at the end of the experiment. This is a step which neither animal carers nor researchers take lightly. The most common euthanasia procedure is one which the animals hardly notice. They are placed in a box containing a mixture of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2). Then the CO2 concentration is slowly increased, causing the animals to gradually lose consciousness and then pass away peacefully. Sometimes the nature of the experiment requires a different euthanasia procedure. In such cases, too, the method chosen must result in the least possible discomfort for the animal. In some cases, animals develop complications over the course of an experiment, which may lead them to suffer more than expected. Researchers will then apply the principle of the humane end point. They will remove the animal from the experiment when its suffering threatens to become unacceptable and then euthanize it to prevent further suffering.

Aims of animal experiments

By far the most animal experiments were carried out to help answer a scientific question. The figure below indicates what these questions entailed. In addition to answering scientific questions, animal experiments were also conducted within the scope of teaching and training, involving, for example, students and animal technicians.


Lab animals will always experience some degree of discomfort. The revised Wod divides discomfort into four categories. Discomfort need not take the form of pain; stress and anxiety are also regarded as discomfort. The table below shows the degrees of discomfort and the percentages of animals involved in 2019.




Mild discomfort


Moderate discomfort


Substantial discomfort


More than substantial discomfort

Breeding efficiency

The UG and the UMCG breed animals themselves, particularly (transgenic) mice and rats. Not all animals bred are used in experiments. In 2017, 40,039 animals were bred, 28,609 of which (about 58%) were not used for experimental purposes. These animals are referred to as ‘surplus animals’ or ‘breeding surplus’. National and international organizations and governments acknowledge that the large number of surplus animals is a problem.

Unfortunately, such surpluses are unavoidable. To obtain reliable research findings, animals in an experiment must be as identical as possible. They should have the same age and sex, for example, or have been born under identical circumstances. Animals also differ in genetic properties, some of which may be undesirable. For an experiment involving 60 identical transgenic mice, for example, as many as 170 mice may have to be bred. For more information, consult the website of the Stichting Informatie Dierproeven (Animal Experiments Information Foundation, in Dutch only). In addition, a substantial percentage of animals bred is required to preserve unique or valuable breeding lines.

Reducing the number of animals that are bred, but not used in experiments is high on the UG’s list of priorities. In 2018, it was still the case that approximately a quarter of the animals bred were supplied for experiments (a few percent more than in 2017). The UG is strongly aware that the number of animals bred and not used is still too high and that a continued effort must be made to reduce the number of animals that are killed without being used.To do so, the UG has started to offer cryopreservation of breeding lines that are no longer actively used for animal experiments.


Rather than maintaining a breeding line that is not needed for some time with live animals, egg cells or sperm are frozen by using a technique called cryopreservation. If the breeding line is needed again, a fertilized egg cell is introduced into a pseudopregnant female. This means that no animals are required to maintain the line in the interim period.
However, freezing egg cells and sperm involves a complicated procedure, with many frozen embryos not being viable, for example. The UG and the UMCG regard cryopreservation as an important technique for reducing the breeding surplus, with the main focus on sperm cryopreservation. This is a highly efficient method for freezing a breeding line, since it requires only two male mice. Stopping breeding lines temporarily through cryopreservation reduces the number of mice by about 200 per breeding line.

Replacement, Reduction, Refinement

The UG and the UMCG apply the 3R principle to research and teaching involving laboratory animals: replacement and reduction of the number of animals and refinement of the experiments in which they are used. Essentially, this means that we use as few animals as possible and conduct animal-free experiments whenever possible. Furthermore, we try to minimize the discomfort experienced by the animals. The Animal Welfare Committee (IvD) helps researchers to put these guidelines into practice.


Researchers are only allowed to conduct an animal experiment if there are no other options. Where possible, we use alternatives to animal experiments in teaching and research, replacing laboratory animals with invertebrates, cells, tissues, computer simulations, video training or slaughterhouse material.


Efforts must be made to reduce the number of animals required in each experiment through a research design specifying the minimum number of animals necessary to achieve reliable findings. This can be achieved, for example, by using standard strains so that the results are more comparable or by conducting a pilot study first.

Sometimes lab animals can be used again after the original experiment, in a follow-up or unrelated experiment or in a teaching activity. In 2019, 2% of animals was used again.


Researchers, animal carers, animal technicians and designated veterinarians are always trying to refine all aspects of animal use and animal welfare. Optimum accommodation and adequate application of research techniques and anaesthesiology should minimize the animals discomfort. Social animals such as rats, for example, are kept in groups, which reduces their stress levels.

By refining animal experiments, we improve the animals’ welfare, which is not only good for them but benefits the quality of research too.

Applying the 3R principle in teaching activities involving lab animals


The Centrale Dienst Proefdieren (CDP) applies the 3R principle as much as possible when lab animals are used for teaching purposes. When inexperienced students are first introduced to a technique, synthetic materials are used as much as possible. Students learning to suture, for example, first practice on a piece of chamois leather.

Microsurgical techniques are first practised using a piece of latex glove under the microscope and then on artificial vessels. If the students’ hand-eye coordination is sufficiently developed, they are allowed to continue with live rats. Synthetic materials are thus used whenever possible. Ultimately, however, the technique to be mastered must be practised in a live organism, since a living animal presents students with a system that is too complex to mimic with synthetic materials. To further reduce the number of animals used, instruction videos have been produced for all relevant biotechnical procedures covered during student training, so that no animals have to be used to demonstrate the techniques. Animals used in teaching are always anaesthetized before an invasive surgical procedure and are euthanized before the anaesthesia wears off, to prevent unnecessary discomfort. By thoroughly training the staff involved in animal experiments, the CDP aims to improve the quality of animal experiments and the animals’ welfare.

Anatomy practical

All Bachelor students of Biology take an anatomy and physiology practical involving the dissection of a rat. Until 2015, these rats were always euthanized shortly before the start of the practical and presented untreated to the students because this procedure results in the best specimens. In frozen and subsequently thawed specimens, certain essential structures proved difficult to see. Over the year, there are sufficient surplus animals available from breeding and invasive and non-invasive experiments to meet the needs of this practical. From the perspective of animal welfare, however, it is undesirable to keep these animals alive until the start of the practical. This is also uneconomical. For this reason, until 2015, the rats used were purchased from a commercial breeder. Despite the fact that almost all these animals were surplus animals from their breeding lines, this situation was less than ideal, not least because of the stress caused to the animals, for example during transport.

For these reasons, 2016 witnessed the start of a highly successful pilot in which surplus rats from our own breeding programme and experiments were embalmed. These embalmed rats proved highly useful in the practical because all the important structures were preserved well, which was not the case with the frozen specimens.

To embalm these rats, the Fix for Life method developed by Leiden University Medical Centre was used. This method employs an embalming fluid which is (virtually) free of the toxic and irritant substances such as formaldehyde and phenol that are commonly used to preserve tissues. This makes the method extremely suitable for teaching purposes. Another advantage is that the embalming fluid has a less offensive smell.

Embalming the rats has proven a win-win situation. First, rats no longer have to be purchased and transported, and our own surplus animals can now serve a useful purpose. At the same time, the specimens have proven extremely suitable for the practical, and their use is less taxing on students.

Organization and facilities

To guarantee optimum animal care and effective research, two modern animal experiment facilities have been set up: CDP at the UMCG and the Facultaire Dienst Dierverzorging (FDD) at the Linnaeusborg.

All animal studies at the UG and the UMCG are conducted either in nature or in one of the laboratories with special animal testing facilities. We take the utmost care to provide the best possible accommodations for lab animals, since they will live out almost their entire lives there. Providing accommodation thus involves more than simply meeting the statutory requirements. The CDP and the FDD have been completely renovated in 2009 and 2011, respectively, and are now among the most modern facilities in Europe. The temperature, lighting and atmospheric humidity in the animal quarters can be precisely controlled.

Inspections by the NVWA

The NVWA carried out two inspections in 2018 (one site visit and one office inspection) and all was in order.

Fish facility

In 2015, two of our researchers stated that they wanted to use animal models with two species of tropical freshwater fish: zebrafish (Danio rerio) and killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri). Although the CDP already had the expertise to breed, house and care for zebrafish, it had no experience with the other species.
To obtain this expertise, internships were organized at a foreign killifish laboratory and collaboration with Dutch colleagues was sought. The fish facility is now running smoothly. For an explanation of the experiments involving killifish, see the interview with researcher Dr Berezikov.

What do you think?

This annual report is intended to show why and how we conduct animal studies. We would like to know what you think of this website. What is good, and what can be improved? Is certain information lacking? Please leave your remarks here.
We will not be able to answer you personally, but we will consider all comments for our next annual report.

Contact form
Permission to use personal data *

About the University of Groningen

The University of Groningen is a research university with a global outlook, deeply rooted in Groningen, City of Talent. The UG is in the top 100 of several important ranking lists. It is very popular with its 30,000 students and staff (5250 FTE) from the Netherlands and abroad, who are encouraged to make the most of their abilities. Talent is nurtured, and the keyword is quality. The University is committed to actively cooperating with its partners in society, with a special focus on its research themes Healthy Ageing, Energy and Sustainable Society.